Bite Size Theory: Behemoth

“Though a debunking doctrine may be a useful tool in scientific analysis, it cannot provide the basis for political action.”

Franz Neumann, 1944, Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism 1933-1944, Oxford University Press.

Posted in Bite Size Theory, Books, Politics, Social Science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bite Size Theory: Western Political Theory in the Face of the Future

“If we are all democrats today, it is not a very cheerful fate to share. Today, in politics, democracy is the name for what we cannot have – yet cannot cease to want.”

John Dunn, 1979, Western Political Theory in the Face of the Future, Cambridge University Press.

 

Posted in Bite Size Theory, Favourite Thinkers, Politics | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Bite Size Theory: Define and Rule

“The indirect rule state was not a weak state. Unlike the preceding era of direct rule, its ambitions were vast: to shape the subjectivities of the colonized population and not simply of their elites.”

Mahmood Mamdami, 2013, Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity, Wits University Press.

Posted in Bite Size Theory, Books, Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Bite Size Theory: The Democracy Project

“All societies are communistic at base, and capitalism is best viewed as a bad way of organizing communism.”

David Graeber, 2013, The Democracy Project, Penguin.

Posted in Bite Size Theory, Politics | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Bite Size Theory: Goldilocks’ Dilemma

“Can we find units of government that are “just right” – small enough to facilitate participation and yet large enough to exercise authority so significant as to make participation worthwhile?”

Robert Dahl, 1970, After the Revolution, Yale University Press.

Posted in Bite Size Theory, Books, Favourite Thinkers, Politics, Social Science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Bite Size Theory: Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline

“It is not an accident or a limitation or a prejudice that we cannot care equally about all the suffering in the world: it is a condition of our existence and our sanity.”

Bernard Williams, 2006, Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline. Princeton University Press.

Posted in Books, Favourite Thinkers, Philosophy | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Bite Size Theory: On Contradiction

“Some contradictions are characterized by open antagonism, others are not”.

Mao Tse Tung, 1966, On Contradiction.

Posted in Bite Size Theory, Politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Bite Size Theory: Ontological Relativity

“Ontology is indeed doubly relative. Specifying the universe of a theory makes sense only relative to some background theory, and only relative to some choice of a manual of translation of one theory into the other”.

W.V. Quine, 1969, Ontological Relativity and other essays, Columbia University Press.

Posted in Bite Size Theory, Philosophy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Bite Size Theory: The Society of Equals

“Symbolically, future generations have replaced the proletariat in the collective imaginary as the focal point of public concern”.

Pierre Rosanvallon, 2013, The Society of Equals, Harvard University Press.

Posted in Bite Size Theory, Books, Favourite Thinkers, Politics | Tagged | 1 Comment

Bite Size Theory: The Visual World of French Theory

Photo Yann Revol“I argue both directly and implicitly that it was the confrontation with the explosion of the art world and its discourses – as well as events on the street and the barricades – that released a generation of philosophers from the ivory tower of the École Normale Supérieure and that their engagement with contemporary art played a crucial role in formulating the new postmodern mindset”.

Sarah Wilson, 2010, The Visual World of French Theory: Figurations, Yale University Press.

Posted in Books, Media, Philosophy, Politics | Tagged , | Leave a comment