Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- James Galbraith critical review of Picketty's Capital in the 21st Century dissentmagazine.org/article/kapita… 2 days ago
- RT @VersoBooks: Robin Blackburn remembers Ernesto Laclau, 1936-2014 bit.ly/1hAE093 2 days ago
- RT @samkinsley: Sad news that Ernesto Laclau has died, in Seville, of a heart attack buenosairesherald.com/article/156933… 2 days ago
- The urbanization of responsibility wp.me/p11K9d-15I 1 week ago
- RT @aljhlester: If interested you can now see preview text from Colonization and Humanitarian Governance (CUP, June) by me and Fae Dussart … 1 week ago
- Are there 15 ways to be unhappy? Surfing Bruno Latour’s 'An Inquiry into Modes of Existence'
- Things to Read
- Jameson on affect and emotions
- Changing Cities: how to think about urban politics
- The urbanization of responsibility
- Place, Space and Politics: New Book Series from Routledge
- The Uses of Social Science
- New book by David Harvey: Rebel Cities