Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- Geography professors compile database of dissertations to analyze changes over time @insidehighered shar.es/1aXyON 7 hours ago
- Bite Size Theory: The Passage of Power wp.me/p11K9d-19v 19 hours ago
- Statistical moralism wp.me/p11K9d-19A 20 hours ago
- Video: The history and present condition of Geography: an historical materialist manifesto (1984) davidharvey.org/2014/06/video-… 1 day ago
- RT @ianbremmer: Urban population, globally 1950 - 30% 2014 - 54% (ht @conradhackett) http://t.co/L4CueVbMqe 2 days ago
- Statistical moralism
- Is governmentality a dirty word?
- Bite Size Theory: The Passage of Power
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry
- The Uses of Social Science
- New book by Nick Couldry on media practices
- Interview with Lauren Berlant
- Libertarian paternalism: where's the harm?
- 'Big-thinking theoretical brains can be the most treacherous': Gitlin on Giddens and Libya