Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- Introducing Human Geographies wp.me/p11K9d-13t 2 days ago
- RT @LabSouthSwindon: RIP Nelson Mandela. You were and will always be an inspiration. 2 days ago
- Research Job at Exeter: Mapping Contention wp.me/p11K9d-13q 3 days ago
- Geography and ethics: the last word wp.me/p11K9d-13j 1 week ago
- JFK Assassination Songs.... turnmeondeadman.com/jfk-assassinat… 2 weeks ago
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry
- What is it like to bat? Dreyfus, McDowell and the exemplary game
- Lunch with Harold Wilson
- Half-read books
- Arts of the Political by Ash Amin and Nigel Thrift: Review
- What happens in Vegas...
- On difficulty: Derek Parfit's new book is published
- Whatever happened to postcolonial theory?
- Urban discontents
- Things to Read