Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- RT @UrbanAfricaACC: FULL TEXT: The State of African Cities 2014 @UNHABITAT Where have we gone wrong, what can be put right? http://t.co/… 22 hours ago
- James Galbraith critical review of Picketty's Capital in the 21st Century dissentmagazine.org/article/kapita… 1 week ago
- RT @VersoBooks: Robin Blackburn remembers Ernesto Laclau, 1936-2014 bit.ly/1hAE093 1 week ago
- RT @samkinsley: Sad news that Ernesto Laclau has died, in Seville, of a heart attack buenosairesherald.com/article/156933… 1 week ago
- The urbanization of responsibility wp.me/p11K9d-15I 2 weeks ago
- Are there 15 ways to be unhappy? Surfing Bruno Latour’s 'An Inquiry into Modes of Existence'
- Is governmentality a dirty word?
- The urbanization of responsibility
- Things to Read
- New book: Democracy and Public Space by John Parkinson
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry
- Jameson on affect and emotions