Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- Stuart Hall and the Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies discoversociety.org/stuart-hall-an… 23 hours ago
- Simon During @publicbooks publicbooks.org/nonfiction/sto… 2 days ago
- The People, Place and Space Reader wp.me/p11K9d-15o 3 days ago
- RT @LSEReviewBooks: Podcast: “Edward Said’s Orientalism made a huge impression on geographers” #geography ow.ly/u6Fkn 5 days ago
- Ghost signs at History of Advertising Trust hatads.org.uk/ads/ghostsigns… 5 days ago
- PhD Studentship available: Geographies of Democracy
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry
- Globalizing Responsibility
- What is it like to bat? Dreyfus, McDowell and the exemplary game
- Place, Space and Politics: New Book Series from Routledge
- Whatever happened to social theory?
- A non-event?
- The People, Place and Space Reader
- Things to Read