Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- Bite Size Theory: Fear Itself wp.me/p11K9d-18b 12 hours ago
- RT @gailfdavies: Welcome to @GeoOpenAccess! Looks like the @RGS_IBG @WB_Geography @AnsonMackay & I have cooked up a new #OA journal http://… 3 days ago
- RT @UniofExeter: Jerusalem Unbound: a City in Conflict ift.tt/1zM9aC7 4 days ago
- Bite Size Theory: The Big Screen wp.me/p11K9d-189 5 days ago
- Bite Size Theory: Rethinking the South African Crisis wp.me/p11K9d-183 1 week ago
- Bite Size Theory: Fear Itself
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry
- Place, Space and Politics: New Book Series from Routledge
- Making Human Geography: New book by Kevin Cox
- Partha Chatterjee on 'After subaltern studies'
- After affect(s): Ruth Leys on affect theory
- The Uses of Social Science
- Teaching at a distance
- New book by David Harvey: Rebel Cities