Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- RT @nogbad: The irony of referring to #Beeching given that East Grinstead, his home, was the first to be axed #saveOUregions https://t.co/… 19 hours ago
- RT @DanielHart19: Open University staff strike over cuts dlvr.it/Cqp38m 19 hours ago
- Who owns our cities – and why this urban takeover should concern us all gu.com/p/4dcd5/stw 19 hours ago
- RT @profdavidharvey: Video: David Harvey - Life & Thought. Interview in Sao Paulo, 30 July 2015 buff.ly/1YqG0nA 1 day ago
- RT @BSABourdieuSG: NEW Derek Robbins: Pierre Bourdieu&Jacques Rancière on art/aesthetics&politics:the origins of disagreement,1963–1985 htt… 1 day ago
- Is governmentality a dirty word?
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry
- Bad Foucault
- Whatever happened to postcolonial theory?
- Place, Space and Politics: New Book Series from Routledge
- Favourite Thinkers VII: Iris Marion Young
- I've got a lot of songs but they're all in my head
- Agonistic pragmatism
- Whatever happened to social theory?