Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- RT @JournalPolitics: 'What kind of thing is resilience?' asks @BenAndersonGeog. Read his answer (no paywall) here: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/14… 4 hours ago
- I’ve got a lot of songs but they’re all in my head clivebarnett.wordpress.com/2015/08/30/ive… http://t.co/yTQsOBi067 1 day ago
- RT @ColinMcFarlane3: Important new journal - Urbanisation - long overdue, focussed on global South (not as a physical location) @iihsin: ht… 5 days ago
- RT @policy_politics: Barnett & @CreatingPublics explore relationship btwn #marketing and #publicaction dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557… 1 week ago
- Give a Man a Fish: reflections on the new politics of distribution - new book by James Fergsuson dukeupress.edu/give-a-man-a-f… 2 weeks ago
- I've got a lot of songs but they're all in my head
- It's not the city, it's the weather we love
- The Uses of Social Science
- Changing imperatives of urban thought in South Africa
- Is governmentality a dirty word?
- Urban discontents
- Things to Read
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry