Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- #firstsevenjobs Paper round Paper round Cleaner Shop assistant Warehouse packer Forklift driver Data input 2 weeks ago
- RT @BelindaJDodson: New urban agenda? Interesting debate on what's new and what's not, but read the comments too. #cities #Agenda2030 https… 2 weeks ago
- Towards a Geography of Injustice clivebarnett.wordpress.com/2016/08/05/tow… https://t.co/SVw9aQ1sC5 2 weeks ago
- Keywords for Southern Studies - UGA Press ugapress.org/index.php/book… 2 weeks ago
- RT @UrbanTheoryLab: Brenner/Schmid, "New epistemology of the urban" + reply to critique of R. Walker: goo.gl/LFyHTv https://t.co… 2 weeks ago
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry
- Bad Foucault
- The Uses of Social Science
- What is it like to bat? Dreyfus, McDowell and the exemplary game
- Is governmentality a dirty word?
- Towards a Geography of Injustice
- The Politics of the Global Challenges Research Fund
- Whatever happened to postcolonial theory?
- Rancière at criticism