Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- RT @RememberThisPod: It's January...do you know what that means? NEW @RememberThisPod EPISODES at the end of this month!!! https://t.co/3zM… 2 days ago
- Derek Parfit obituary theguardian.com/world/2017/jan… 2 days ago
- Wiley: Foucault: The Birth of Power - Stuart Elden eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Wiley… 2 days ago
- Nice on Rorty's imptc, bit caricatured of MF, who after all RR did more to popularise than anyone else. twitter.com/joncinnamon/st… 2 days ago
- New Book: Political Street Art clivebarnett.wordpress.com/2017/01/12/new… https://t.co/NNMbR9B5e0 4 days ago
- On difficulty: Derek Parfit's new book is published
- Is governmentality a dirty word?
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry
- New Book: Migration, Squatting and Radical Autonomy
- Whatever happened to social theory?
- Whatever happened to postcolonial theory?
- Favourite Thinkers I: Stanley Cavell
- Favourite Thinkers II: Pauline Kael
- New Book: Psychological Governance and Public Policy
- Are there 15 ways to be unhappy? Surfing Bruno Latour’s 'An Inquiry into Modes of Existence'