Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- Nick Mahony on public engagement - renovating the public wp.me/p1GJk8-1r5 via @ThomsonPat 1 day ago
- Mapping 65 Years of Explosive Urban Growth Around the World citylab.com/work/2015/12/m… 1 day ago
- RT @kenanmalik: The District Six Museum is one of the most moving I have visited. My article on the museum and apartheid then & now: https:… 1 day ago
- Where are the world's newest cities … and why do they all look the same? theguardian.com/cities/2016/ja… 2 days ago
- Urban environments in Africa - Garth Myers policypress.co.uk/display.asp?K=… 2 days ago
- Whatever happened to social theory?
- The Uses of Social Science
- Theorizing the Arab Spring
- Is governmentality a dirty word?
- The People, Place and Space Reader
- Place, Space and Politics: New Book Series from Routledge
- Favourite Thinkers I: Stanley Cavell
- On the milieu of security: Paper and discussion in Dialogues in Human Geography
- Big Questions for the Big Society