Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- RT @RGS_IBGhe: New in @GeoOpenAccess - The politics of the #anthropocene: a dialogue between Andrew Barry & @ProfMarkMaslin https://t.co/Dc… 18 hours ago
- RT @ZedBooks: “A work of sustained blasphemy.” - 50% off THE DELUSIONS OF ECONOMICS zedbooks.net/blog/posts/the… 18 hours ago
- Sadiq Khan mayoral triumph is Labour's blueprint for surviving Corbyn theguardian.com/uk-news/davehi… 1 day ago
- RT @AfricasaCountry: RIP Radio Raheem. Actor and director Bill Nunn has passed away. facebook.com/17091293297959… 4 days ago
- RT @AmooreLouise: Still the most inspiring answer ever to an interview question about "better alternatives" #Foucault #ethics https://t.co/… 5 days ago
- Is governmentality a dirty word?
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry
- Whatever happened to postcolonial theory?
- The Politics of the Global Challenges Research Fund
- Affect and Judgment
- Neuroscience, politics, and judgment
- Does 'ontology' matter?
- Review of Ash Amin's Land of Strangers
- On difficulty: Derek Parfit's new book is published
- After affect(s): Ruth Leys on affect theory