Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- It’s not the city, it’s the weather we love clivebarnett.wordpress.com/2015/07/30/its… http://t.co/RthRIke9WI 8 hours ago
- Changing imperatives of urban thought in South Africa clivebarnett.wordpress.com/2015/07/30/cha… http://t.co/anVXeWjLtx 15 hours ago
- Urban policy mobilities, argumentation and the case of the model city tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108… 1 week ago
- New survey explores spectrum of urban governance arrangements worldwide – UN-Habitat unhabitat.org/new-survey-exp… 1 week ago
- Jürgen Habermas’s verdict on the EU/Greece debt deal – full transcript | Philip Oltermann gu.com/p/4ambz/stw 1 week ago
- Changing imperatives of urban thought in South Africa
- It's not the city, it's the weather we love
- Approaches to Human Geography: new edition published
- Class in Human Geography
- Things to Read
- Where is Urban Politics? Symposium in IJURR
- Waldron on political theory
- Andy Merrifield's Urban Questions
- Whatever happened to postcolonial theory?