Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- Environment and Urbanization Issue on the New Urban Agenda clivebarnett.wordpress.com/2016/05/05/env… 15 hours ago
- Bite Size Theory clivebarnett.wordpress.com/2016/05/04/bit… 1 day ago
- RT @VersoBooks: History Workshop have made all of Raphael Samuel's HWJ texts free on the twentieth anniversary of his death https://t.co/rz… 2 days ago
- Bite Size Theory clivebarnett.wordpress.com/2016/05/02/bit… 3 days ago
- A selective résumé clivebarnett.wordpress.com/2016/04/29/a-s… https://t.co/QBZ1nJgxqN 6 days ago
- Environment and Urbanization Issue on the New Urban Agenda
- A selective résumé
- Urban Theory in the New Urban Agenda
- Is governmentality a dirty word?
- Against the Smart City
- Where is Urban Politics? Symposium in IJURR
- Bite Size Theory: Between Facts and Norms
- My Loss Library
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry