Is the more or less grudging involvement of social theorists with the Libyan regime in the 2000s now shown to be an index of naivety, or stupidity, or venality? The involvement of David Held and the LSE has been much discussed this week, via Saif Gaddafi’s PhD, and an optimistic commentary by Anthony Giddens in 2007 unearthed. Rather more interesting perhaps is the democratic theorist Benjamin Barber, whose involvement with the Qadaffi Foundation is long-standing. Here is a comment by Barber in 2007 on the ‘normalisation’ of relations with Libya, around nuclear weapons and the ‘war on terror’ in particular. Barber has now resigned from this organisation, and this involvement is the basis of his rather sobering analysis of the prospects for democratization in Libya whatever the outcome of current events.
- Derek Gregory - On the road wp.me/p2Acb0-2Dy via @wordpressdotcom 14 hours ago
- “West Memphis" by Lucinda Williams cbsnews.com/videos/saturda… 1 week ago
- Derek Gregory Lecture: Angry Eyes. University of Exeter, 10th March. rkt.cmail1.com/t/ViewEmail/r/… 1 week ago
- Most people now live in #cities. But why and where is #urbanisation happening? Via @SciDevNet and @K_i_l_n #dataviz bit.ly/13UsWzX 2 weeks ago
- Songs from South Africa wp.me/p11K9d-1dl 2 weeks ago
- Is governmentality a dirty word?
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry
- On difficulty: Derek Parfit's new book is published
- Space, contestation and the political: themed issue of Geoforum
- Are there 15 ways to be unhappy? Surfing Bruno Latour’s 'An Inquiry into Modes of Existence'
- New Book: ATLAS: Geography, Architecture and Change in an Interdependent World
- Neoliberalism after governmentality
- Libertarian paternalism: where's the harm?