Here is an interview with Simon Critchley, on his new book Faith of the Faithless, which in part continues a ‘debate’ with Zizek about violence and non-violence. You could win the book, if you know which football team he supports.
- RT @marye_upton: For activists and others: oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/oxfam/bitstrea… 4 hours ago
- RT @NeilAdger: Climate change causes loss. Loss defines us. How to understand it: in @natureclimate @ ProfLesleyHead et al. https://t.co/a… 4 hours ago
- RT @TNatureOfCities: Five specific steps the scientific community can take to support the New Urban Agenda emerging from Habitat III https:… 20 hours ago
- The Quito Papers: An intellectual counterpoint to the New Urban Agenda shar.es/1EPpqm via @sharethis 21 hours ago
- RT @TheSocReview: Ethnography as being-in-the-world rather than method buff.ly/2ekoftW 21 hours ago
- Affect theory: Ruth Leys critique in Critical Inquiry
- Is governmentality a dirty word?
- Review of Blue Jeans: the art of the ordinary
- Bite Size Theory: Wrong-Doing and Truth-Telling
- Chatterjee on Subaltern Studies and Capital
- Critical spatial theory: my thoughts
- More on the critique of affect theory
- Environment and Urbanization Issue on the New Urban Agenda
- The Femicide Machine: new book by Sergio González Rodríguez
- After affect(s): Ruth Leys on affect theory